To Whine or not to Whine; That is the Question

This blog is driving Loftus crazy. John just can't seem to handle the fact that JPH is on Blogger now (well, as been for a while as a matter of fact), and now refers to us implicitally. I'm sure there are other sites on John's mind, a few I don't like myself (Debunking Atheists is one example), but you know that most of what John speaks of is right here. He uses the same hints of language as he's posted here on some of these posts of mine. Now, he's safe in his retreat where he can lash out at us some more:

From time to time a friend will send me a link to a site that attempts to deal with an argument of mine. I'm glad people are thinking and attempting to deal with my arguments, of course. But some of these sites are filled with so many obvious straw man type arguments, non-sequiturs, either/or fallacies, and/or ad hominems that it amazes me these writers actually think they've considered my arguments at all. I don't think this is just a matter of believers who are blinded by their faith, although that's certainly a factor. It's that they cannot think. There are rules for thinking critically and these people cannot do it.

In any case, when I see these types of sites I figure it won't do any good to respond because if they couldn't think critically in their first post they won't be able to do so a second time in response to my comment.

All that John does here is give us a grocery list of unmentioned "non-sequitirs" and "ad-hominens." Gee, I guess John didn't think about that one while he called me an asshole, now didn't he (he still hasn't explained what he means by the word, btw)? Or how about the "sewer forum" he visits on occasion? Whatever happened to John detesting JP so much he couldn't stand him, or us for the matter? Where does John get off with these statements? Where is the rationality in them; it's nonexistent.

Funny enough people still are willing to be convinced by John that it would have to be the responsibility of this blog to spell out everything in black and white ink. John's irrationality is so much that often words don't do any justice, yet people still buy into him and go along with it.

John's "hit and run" tactics remind me very much of household cats. I'll let the late George Carlin explain if you don't know why already: