The Cowboy Who Wasn't There: E-book Companion Site

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

When John's Arguments Make Sense

These days its hard to tell between when John is debating live and posting -- either way it comes out as a bunch of meandering, slurred speech, as though he composed it while on mushrooms. Case in point. This posting:

Why Do My Arguments Not Convince Devout Believers?

I merely offer up good arguments against their faith. That's all I can do. Devout believers (my target audience) won't seriously consider them until such time as they have some sort of crisis in their lives that cannot be adequately explained by a good God. They'll seriously consider them at that time. My arguments are like seeds of doubt ready to sprout if and when they experience that crisis. Since many believers do experience some kind of crisis in their lives there will be a certain percentage of believers who, having been previously exposed to my arguments, will leave their faith at that time. It's a waiting game.
Apparently, Loftus is too dull to realize that was he is saying here is that his arguments are most persuasive when people are in a state of mind that is not calm and rational. You have to be afflicted by some sort of emotional turmoil -- at a time precisely when your critical thinking and objectivity is at its lowest -- to be convinced by what he says.

Well, that's what we've been saying all along, isn't it?

5 comments:

  1. Crystal Night, Atheists!


    FINALE:



    Have I said this before?


    http://nostraamerica.atspace.com/


    PULLING THE PLUG on atheism


    http://www.firstscience.com/site/articles/coles.asp




    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3332/3228845133_3599f8108f.jpg



    bye


    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20090126/as-indonesia-solar-eclipse/images/c52d9d50-7ca2-4c3a-b13c-c866836298c8.jpg





    Einstein puts the final nail in the coffin of atheism...


    *************************************

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7vpw4AH8QQ

    *************************************



    atheists deny their own life element...




    LIGHT OR DEATH, ATHEISTS?


    ********************************
    ***************************LIGHT*********
    ************************************

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think what John Loftus is saying is something more along the lines of . . .

    People who have a well developed world view are unlikely to relinquish it over night after running into puzzling questions concerning only a few of its aspects. All thinking people develop world views as ways of understanding both their personal world and the cosmos around them, and their worldview fits together for them and becomes an ingrained part of that person. Well worn ways of interpreting people and things around become so commonplace that people with well developed world views can reply to questions and counter-arguments without even having to consider their replies too much. Even their mental circuits become reflexive to a certain degree. And they are certain they are right.

    There's two ways that a worldview can change after it is deeply ingrained:

    1) It can die a slow death over time, a death of a thousand qualifications. The person adds qualifications and sub-qualifications whenever puzzling data is noted, or the person begins admitting that more and more remains a mystery. At some point the worldview itself may be ejected or liberalized considerably. And a search continues for another worldview, one more inclusive, perhaps more mysterious, or if the person turns toward atheism, mysterious in another sense a strictly naturalistic one, such as the sense of wonder at undiscovered questions and territories.

    2) The second way in which a well developed, well worn worldview is jarred loose is via traumatic experiences or realizations. Such experiences or realizations can make a person "question everything they thought they once believed or knew," and make them want to "start from scratch" when it comes to holding a worldview.

    And yes, such experiences can occur to both atheists and Christians. They can occur to people of different denominations and churches within Christianity as well, who may switch to other denominations or churches, or to other religions. See my online paper, "The Uniqueness of the Christian Experience," and of course, Leaving the Fold: Testimonies of Former Fundamentalists, but most of the testimonies found therein are of the first variety not the second.

    ReplyDelete
  3. CONTINUED

    Lastly, a statistical study was made of converts to Evangelical Christianity by Starbucks. The study was mentioned in Christianity Today.

    "In the late 1800s, Edwin Starbuck conducted ground-breaking studies on conversion to Christianity. Ever since then, scholars, attempting either to verify or disprove his findings, have repeatedly demonstrated them to be accurate. Most observers agree that what Starbuck observed is to a large extent still valid. From these studies we learn two significant things: the age at which conversion to Christianity most often occurs, and the motivational factors involved in conversion. Starbuck noted that the average age of a person experiencing a religious conversion was 15.6 years. Other
    studies have produced similar results; as recently as 1979, Virgil Gillespie wrote that the average age of conversion in America is 16 years.

    "Starbuck listed EIGHT PRIMARY MOTIVATING FACTORS:

    (1) fears,
    (2) other self-regarding motives,
    (3) altruistic motives,
    (4) following out a moral ideal,
    (5) remorse for and conviction of sin,
    (6) response to teaching,
    (7) example and imitation, and
    (8) urging and social pressure.

    "Recent studies reveal that people still become Christians mainly for these
    same reasons.

    "What conclusions can be drawn from this information? First, the average age
    of conversion is quite young. Postadolescent persons do not seem to find
    Christianity as attractive as do persons in their teens. Indeed, for every
    year the non-Christian grows older than 25, the odds increase exponentially
    against his or her ever becoming a Christian.

    "Second, the reasons people become Christians appear to have at least as
    much to do with sociological factors as with purely 'religious' factors (for
    example, conviction of sin)."

    [SOURCE: CT Classic: The Adult Gospel: The average convert to Islam is 31
    years old. Why does Christianity attract mostly teens? By Larry Poston]

    ReplyDelete
  4. As usual, Edski is well skilled at vomiting forth nothing but hot air using as many words as possible.

    "I think what John Loftus is saying is something more along the lines of . . . "

    No, Edski, he's not saying ANY of that.

    You're using eisegesis on John's words the same way you used to contrive rationalizations about what the Bible was saying when you were a Christian fundy rather than an atheist one.

    As usual, you're too ignorant to deal in real arguments, so you bury yourself in distractions that have to do with motivations.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The arguments made by Ed and Starbuck's list
    ""
    "Starbuck listed EIGHT PRIMARY MOTIVATING FACTORS:

    (1) fears,
    (2) other self-regarding motives,
    (3) altruistic motives,
    (4) following out a moral ideal,
    (5) remorse for and conviction of sin,
    (6) response to teaching,
    (7) example and imitation, and
    (8) urging and social pressure.
    ""

    are just as valid for conversion to atheism (yes, even point (5): some people deconvert not to deal with the responsibility of their actions)... and that goes for the age of 'deconversion' as well (atheists should take the outsider challenge as well).

    So... even if Loftus is trying to make the point you are trying to make, in the end, what Holding said it's basically true: the only people that can be deconverted by Loftus arguments are either people ignorant of their own faith or people who are unstable.

    ReplyDelete

If you are unaware of the rules on comments, please consult this post for more information.

Complaints and suggestions about the blog's comment moderation policies should be addressed here.

READ BEFORE POSTING: Do not post comments if they do not deal with the topic addressed in our posts and ESPECIALLY if they deal with pointing out the hypocricy of Christians and the flaws of the Christian religion. This is not about issues of sensitivity but maintaining an atmosphere of freshness and relevant discourse. ANYONE posting these comments (in the event they do NOT deal with the topics we have introduced) will have their comments deleted without warning. Post with care and attention to this simple request, thank you.

NOTE: This blog mirrors Debunking Christianity in that we allow only registered users of Blogger and Google accounts in commenting on our web pages. Anonymous commentators are not permitted.